September 11, 2023, the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration introduced1 it had authorised reformulated monovalent COVID pictures by Pfizer and Moderna to be used in people 12 years of age and older. In addition they issued emergency use authorization (EUA) to be used of the reformulated jabs in kids aged 6 months to 11 years.2
The up to date mRNA injections comprise a single modified RNA mentioned to correspond to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5., which was the dominant variant within the U.S. for many of 2023, however which has since been changed by different variants.
Based on authorities, nevertheless, this pressure is totally different sufficient from the strains in any of the earlier pictures to advocate everybody take it, no matter your earlier COVID jab historical past.3
Luckily, most People will not be falling for a similar lies this time round. Most have realized that the pictures are ineffective and may trigger all types of well being issues, together with coronary heart injury and immune system deregulation. Most individuals are additionally uninterested in the endless boosters.
In all, high-risk people (such because the aged and/or immunocompromised of all ages) who have been advisable to get extra doses could have acquired as many as six mRNA injections at this level — a three-dose major sequence in 2021,4 two boosters to the first sequence throughout 2021/2022,5 and one bivalent booster within the fall of 2022.6 The newest reformulation for XBB.1.5 would be the seventh in simply three years.7
Non-mRNA Shot Approved as Public Rejects mRNA
Uptake of the brand new monovalent pictures has been disappointing, nevertheless. As of October 12, 2023, solely 7 million People had rolled up their sleeves. For comparability, by October 12, 2022, greater than 18 million had acquired the bivalent booster launched that September, and by Could 2023, 17% of the inhabitants — 56.5 million folks — had acquired it.8
Assuming the U.S. inhabitants is 340.47 million folks,9 7 million is simply about 2.06%. Based on CIDRAP Information,10 booster uptake is being “hindered by prior infections” and “concern of unintended effects.” That’s what an October 2023 research11 discovered. As famous in that paper:
“Probably the most generally reported motive for not having been boosted was a previous SARS-CoV-2 an infection (39.5%), adopted by concern about vaccine unintended effects (31.5%), believing that the booster wouldn’t present extra safety over the vaccines already acquired (28.6%), and concern about booster security (23.4%) or that it will not defend from SARS-CoV-2 an infection (23.1%).
For themes associated to causes for not having been boosted, these 60 years of age or older have been much less more likely to choose objects associated to data or logistical considerations in regards to the vaccine; whereas these reporting Hispanic ethnicity have been extra more likely to convey considerations about logistics than these reporting non-Hispanic ethnicity.
Lastly, in comparison with school graduates, these with some school or technical college have been considerably extra more likely to choose objects associated to the dangers and advantages of the bivalent vaccine not being clear as causes for not having been boosted.”
Word how they downplayed folks’s concern about vaccine unintended effects. They separated “concern about vaccine unintended effects” (31.5%) and “concern about booster security” (23.4%), which is the very same factor. Add them collectively, and 54.9% are skipping additional boosters resulting from fears about their security.
To Allay Fears, FDA Grants EUA to Non-mRNA COVID Vaccine
The FDA’s authorization12 of an up to date non-mRNA COVID vaccine — Nuvaxovid, a subunit protein vaccine made by Novavax — is reportedly a part of the technique to encourage uptake amongst those that are “hesitant in regards to the mRNA vaccines.”13
The up to date Novavax vaccine was approved by the FDA in early October 2023 for ages 12 and older, no matter earlier COVID jab standing. Like Pfizer’s and Moderna’s new pictures, the up to date Nuvaxovid targets the SARS-CoV-2 variant XBB.1.5, and the FDA is encouraging folks to pick out whichever shot they like (mRNA or non-mRNA).14
Novavax Is Not Utilizing Effectively-Examined Know-how Both
Whereas Novavax isn’t utilizing the mRNA platform, it’s not utilizing completely tried and true vaccine expertise both. Reasonably than rising the viral protein in eggs or mammalian cells, as has been completed for many years, the corporate is producing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in moth cells.15 As defined by NebraskaMed.com:16
“The Novavax technique makes use of moth cells to make spike proteins:
1.Researchers choose the specified genes that create sure SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike protein).
2. Researchers put the genes right into a baculovirus, an insect virus.
3. The baculovirus infects moth cells and replicates inside them.
4. These moth cells create numerous spike proteins.
5. Researchers extract and purify the spike proteins.
‘The Novavax vaccine has no genetic materials, solely proteins,’ says Dr. Florescu. ‘The vaccine expertise is extra conventional, and it is similar to a protein-based influenza vaccine.’”
Nuvaxovid additionally incorporates a proprietary adjuvant known as Matrix-M, which is predicated on saponin extracted from the bark of the Chilean soapbark tree. Like different adjuvants, it boosts your physique’s immune response to the viral protein, which permits a smaller dose of spike protein for use. Based on revealed research, Matrix-M has a wonderful security profile, however the place have we heard that earlier than? I, for one, will look forward to impartial corroboration earlier than making such claims.
Effectiveness and Security of Novavax
Novavax is alleged to have the identical diploma of effectiveness as the opposite COVID pictures. Based on a research17 revealed in early October 2023, the Novavax vaccine launched in late 2021 was 31% efficient in opposition to identified SARS-CoV-2 an infection and 50% efficient in opposition to symptomatic COVID-19 through the first 4 months. Just like the mRNA pictures, effectiveness in opposition to an infection waned from there.
As for security, Novavax seems to be much less dangerous than the mRNA pictures on the subject of myocarditis and different heart-related injury, however severe unintended effects do happen, as evidenced in knowledge18 from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention.
Out of a cohort of 1,148 teenagers aged 12 to 17, 52 (3.6%) skilled a extreme systemic occasion after the primary dose of Novavax, and 304 (21.9%) had a extreme systemic occasion after the second dose. One teen boy was identified with myocarditis after his second dose, and the FDA formally concluded that his situation was “associated to the vaccine.”19
Amongst adults, ages 18 to 64, 2.4% skilled a severe systemic antagonistic occasion after the primary dose and 13% had a severe occasion after the second dose. Among the many aged (65 and older), 1.6% had a severe occasion after the primary dose and 4.4% after the second.20 So, clearly, Novavax seems to be far riskier for youthful folks than older ones.
Curiously, on the final minute, the European Medicines Company (EMA) determined to push again its authorization of the up to date Novavax shot, and is asking the corporate for extra info. In August 2022, the EMA advisable Novavax add a warning about the potential for coronary heart irritation to its vaccine.21
So, what’s the EMA involved about now that the FDA isn’t? “FDA did authorize it — however don’t take it, as there should be a major drawback,” Dr. Meryl Nass warned in an October 16, 2023, Substack put up.22
The place’s the Emergency?
As talked about, the FDA has solely approved Novavax for emergency use. It doesn’t have full approval. However wait a second. Wasn’t the COVID emergency declaration formally ended Could 11, 2023? It positive was, so, how can the FDA situation Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Novavax when there’s no emergency?
Brief reply: the FDA made up new guidelines on the fly. Once more. As famous within the FDA’s letter to Novavax, dated October 3, 2023:23
“On February 4, 2020, as amended on March 15, 2023, pursuant to Part 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Meals, Drug, and Beauty Act … the Secretary of the Division of Well being and Human Companies (HHS) decided that there’s a public well being emergency, or a vital potential for a public well being emergency, that impacts, or has a major potential to have an effect on nationwide safety or the well being and safety of United States residents residing overseas, and that includes the virus that causes Coronavirus Illness 2019 (COVID-19) …
On July 13, 2022, the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA or the Company) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine … pursuant to Part 564 of the Act … On October 3, 2023, having concluded that revising this EUA is acceptable to guard the general public well being or security below part 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the Could 11, 2023 letter of authorization …”
The emphasis within the above paragraph is mine. There are a number of curious issues occurring right here. For starters, in keeping with this letter, the FDA approved Novavax primarily based on the POTENTIAL for a public well being emergency, not an precise emergency.
Secondly, it specifies that this potential public well being emergency should have an effect on both nationwide safety or the well being of People “residing overseas.” Isn’t that curious? Why is there no point out of U.S. residents who stay in the US? To reiterate, the potential emergency solely covers two issues: threats to nationwide safety and residents who stay overseas.
In studying the modification within the Federal Register,24 the explanation for this oddity turns into clear. That’s the one justification the secretary may use to declare an “potential emergency” that might authorize the FDA to situation the EUA.
There are solely 4 conditions below which the HHS secretary can justify EUA and the opposite three require us to be below assault from a chemical, organic, radiological or nuclear weapon.
The HHS isn’t going to confess SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, so the HHS Secretary selected the one justification out there, which is a “potential” public well being emergency “that impacts, or has a major potential to have an effect on, nationwide safety or the well being and safety of United States residents residing overseas.”
That willpower approved the FDA to situation an EUA to Novavax although no emergency exists, and although People residing within the U.S. will not be even coated by the potential emergency. It’s ridiculous, however that’s the place we’re.
mRNA-Associated Deaths Is the Actual Emergency
If there’s an emergency, it’s that kids and younger adults are dying in file numbers and individuals are linking these deaths to the mRNA pictures, therefore the dramatic drop in booster uptake.
As reported by Dr. William Makis25 and the Moral Skeptic,26 the surplus mortality for start to 24-year-olds is now at 41.7% — an historic excessive, and massively increased than 2020, when extra mortality for this age group remained properly inside historic norms.
They Used COVID to Get Untested Vaccines to Market
Importantly, identical to the up to date mRNA pictures, the up to date Novavax vaccine has not undergone extra testing. It’s security is completely primarily based on the unique method, investigational monovalent and bivalent vaccines that didn’t make it to market, and postmarketing knowledge.
Based on the FDA,27 “The information accrued … are related to Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine, Adjuvanted (2023-2024 Method) because the vaccines are manufactured utilizing an identical course of.” Nonetheless, it’s not the manufacturing course of alone that determines how dangerous an mRNA shot may be. The antigen used, and different elements which will or might not have modified, seemingly play a much more essential function.
Contemplating the spike is essentially the most pathogenic a part of the virus, and the reformulated pictures comprise a wholly totally different spike, how can we assume that the security will likely be similar to that of the unique pictures that have been primarily based on the Wuhan spike? We are able to’t.
What we’ve got now could be a model new paradigm the place vaccines are allowed to be dropped at market with out testing, which little question is a vaccine maker’s dream come true. They’re additionally blatantly ignoring clear EUA guidelines and misusing authority to declare emergency when none exists.
Additionally, recall the FDA licensed Comirnaty whereas concurrently extending EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech jab. It was a basic bait and change, as folks have been instructed to get the now “totally licensed” jab, when in reality the pictures they acquired weren’t licensed in any respect, however nonetheless the experimental and unlicensed EUA product.
Based on the legislation, EUA can solely be given when there’s no authorised various, so as soon as Comirnaty was authorised, the FDA misplaced its authorized means to protect ANY of the EUAs, even when there was an precise emergency.
Well being Authorities Have Gone Rogue and Make Their Personal Guidelines
Have been the legislation adopted, Comirnaty can be the one COVID jab out there within the U.S., however right here we’re, with no emergency and EUAs for each mRNA pictures (Pfizer’s and Moderna’s 2023 formulation for youngsters aged 6 months to 11 years28) and Novavax, for anybody 12 and older.
On prime of that, EUA merchandise have been added to the childhood vaccination schedule, which is a transparent violation as properly. The explanation behind it’s because that was the one solution to completely indemnify Pfizer and Moderna from monetary legal responsibility for accidents and deaths.
Present EUA merchandise are additionally freed from legal responsibility, as a result of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act legal responsibility defend for the COVID-19 vaccines has been prolonged by Dec. 31, 2024,29 although the emergency declaration resulted in Could 2023.
Each choice made by the FDA and CDC up to now factors to the truth that they intend to get rid of scientific rigor and simply check new vaccines and gene therapies immediately on the general public. Proof additionally tells us they don’t have any qualms in regards to the dying toll. At greatest, they don’t care how many individuals die. At worst, they hope to maximise extra deaths.
It’s exhausting for the common particular person to grasp how well being authorities might be so callous, however when you perceive that these businesses are working with the identical globalist cabal that’s pushing the inexperienced agenda (the place people are to be displaced to guard the setting), the transhumanist agenda (which seeks to rework mankind into organic robots) and the eugenics agenda (which seeks to get rid of “ineffective eaters” and forestall them from breeding), it turns into simpler to see why mass dying may be a suitable consequence, if not a purpose in itself.
Acquired the Jab? Take Motion to Safeguard Your Well being
If you happen to already acquired a number of jabs and now have considerations about your well being, before everything, by no means take one other COVID booster, one other mRNA gene remedy shot or common vaccine. It is advisable to finish the assault in your system.
If you happen to developed signs you didn’t have earlier than your shot, I might encourage you to hunt out skilled assist. At current, the Entrance Line COVID-19 Vital Care Alliance (FLCCC) appears to have among the finest therapy protocols for post-jab accidents. It’s known as I-RECOVER and could be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.30
Dr. Pierre Kory, who cofounded the FLCCC, has transitioned to treating the vaccine injured roughly solely. For extra info, see DrPierreKory.com. Dr. Peter McCullough can be investigating post-jab therapies, which you’ll find on PeterMcCulloughMD.com.
The World Well being Council has additionally revealed lists of treatments that may assist inhibit, neutralize and get rid of spike protein, which most consultants agree is the first offender. I coated these in my 2021 article, “World Council for Well being Reveals Spike Protein Detox.”
