Within the video above, John Campbell, Ph.D., a retired nurse educator, opinions the proposed amendments to the 2005 Worldwide Well being Rules (IHR), which is the instrument that empowers the World Well being Group to declare a Public Well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern (PHEIC).
If these amendments undergo, nonetheless, the WHO will likely be empowered to do an entire lot greater than that. It is going to grow to be the de facto governing physique of all member states, together with the U.S.
Now, in line with so-called “truth checkers,” the WHO could have no authority to dictate U.S. well being coverage underneath the amended IHR or the proposed pandemic treaty, nor will nations be stripped of their sovereignty.1 However they’re utterly unsuitable. The one motive they’re denying these truths is as a result of they don’t need the general public to strain authorities to reject these proposals, as they need to.
As famous by Campbell and others, together with bioweapons knowledgeable Francis Boyle, Ph.D., and researcher James Roguski,2 the pandemic treaty and the IHR amendments are clearly written by specialists in each nationwide and worldwide regulation and seem “hermetic.”
There’s merely little question that, as at the moment written, these devices will likely be legally binding and can supersede native and nationwide legal guidelines. They even embrace enforcement instruments to make sure that member nations adjust to the WHO’s edicts.
One other false propaganda angle is that these devices solely apply to infectious illness pandemics, however that isn’t true both. Areas of life which might be being added in underneath the umbrella of “well being” embrace local weather, meals manufacturing and even poverty, so the WHO will be capable of declare sole international authority over something to do with these points as effectively.
In his video, Campbell goes via a number of of the proposed IHR amendments, and the way they may affect nationwide sovereignty and public well being choices. The article-by-article compilation of the proposed amendments3 may be discovered right here.
Strikethroughs within the textual content point out that the textual content is to be deleted, and the additions or revisions are underlined in daring. The next are among the most disconcerting amendments, copied with the deletions and insertions of textual content displaying.
New IHR Will Be Binding and Can Apply to Something
Article 1 Definitions — “‘standing advice’ means non-binding recommendation issued by WHO for particular ongoing public well being dangers pursuant to Article 16 concerning applicable well being measures for routine or periodic utility wanted to forestall or cut back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide site visitors;
‘momentary advice’ means non-binding recommendation issued by WHO pursuant to Article 15 for utility on a time-limited, risk-specific foundation, in response to a public well being emergency of worldwide concern, in order to forestall or cut back the worldwide unfold of illness and decrease interference with worldwide site visitors.”
For the reason that phrase “non-binding” is eliminated, because of this any advice from the WHO will likely be binding and member states will likely be required to observe the WHO’s suggestions.
Article 2 Scope and Function — “The aim and scope of those Rules are to forestall, defend towards, put together, management and supply a public well being response to the worldwide unfold of illnesss together with via well being techniques readiness and resilience in methods which might be commensurate with and restricted to public well being threat
all dangers with a possible to affect public well being, and which keep away from pointless interference with worldwide site visitors and commerce, livelihoods, human rights, and equitable entry to well being merchandise and well being care applied sciences and understand how.”
This actually opens the door for the WHO to take over for almost any motive. It doesn’t even should be an actual public well being risk. It might be a possible, unproven or suspected risk.
Human Dignity, Rights and Freedoms Will Not Be Factored In
Article 3 Ideas — “The implementation of those Rules shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and elementary freedoms of individuals primarily based on the ideas of fairness, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their widespread however differentiated tasks of the States Events, considering their social and financial growth.”
In different phrases, bodily autonomy and private selection are being changed by one-size-fits-all medication that has no regard for human dignity, human rights or elementary freedoms. The appropriate to a lot as an opinion may also be eliminated on the nationwide stage.
Article 10 Verification — “If the State Get together doesn’t settle for the provide of collaboration inside 48 hours , WHO could shall , when justified by the magnitude of the general public well being threat, instantly share with different States Events the knowledge out there to it, while encouraging the State Get together to just accept the provide of collaboration by WHO, making an allowance for the views of the State Get together involved.”
So, if the WHO suspects that an outbreak inside a nation would possibly pose a world risk, however the nation in query doesn’t need to collaborate with the WHO, the WHO will instantly inform the opposite members concerning the suspected risk, which is able to put strain on the uncooperative nation, and the views of that nation will likely be deemed irrelevant.
Different amendments inside this and different articles additionally particularly take away any involvement of the nation within the WHO’s decision-making. Article 13 under is however one instance. As famous by Campbell, the director-general is repeatedly specified as the only authority in the case of making assessments and choices. The director-general may also impose sanctions on nations that refuse to observe his dictates.4
How can a single individual be given the authority to make choices for your complete world? This sort of authoritarian top-down system can solely harm public well being, as public well being is finest served by native resolution makers which have entry to native information.
Director-Basic Can Act Unilaterally on Mere Suspicion
Article 12 Dedication of a Public Well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern, Public Well being Emergency of Regional Concern, or Intermediate Well being Alert — “If the Director-Basic considers, primarily based on an evaluation underneath these Rules, {that a} potential or precise public well being emergency of worldwide concern is happening, the Director-Basic shall notify all States Events and search to seek the advice of with the State Get together in whose territory the occasion arises concerning this preliminary dedication …”
The important thing drawback right here is the addition of “potential or precise.” The WHO can take over if the director-general has a mere suspicion {that a} well being emergency may be brewing. The risk doesn’t should be actual or evident.
Article 13 Public Well being Response — “On the request of a State Get together, WHO shall collaborate articulate clearly outlined help to a State Get together provide help to a State Get together within the response to public well being dangers and different occasions by offering technical steerage , well being merchandise, applied sciences, know-how, deployment of civil medical personals, and help and by assessing the effectiveness of the management measures in place, together with the mobilization of worldwide groups of specialists for on-site help …”
Once more, enter from the member state is not going to be accepted. It’s not about collaborating with the WHO on well being emergencies. It’s about obeying it. The WHO will independently resolve what’s to be finished. The WHO might also ship in its personal medical personnel to deal with the state of affairs.
Newly Added Articles
A number of new articles have additionally been added to flesh out and describe the WHO’s authority, and what member states should do to adjust to this new top-down order. Listed here are two telling ones.
NEW Article 13A WHO Led Worldwide Public Well being Response — “States [sic] Events acknowledge WHO because the steerage and coordinating authority of worldwide public well being response throughout public well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern and undertake to observe WHO’s suggestions of their worldwide public well being response.”
In different phrases, member nations shall bow all the way down to the WHO and do as they’re advised. A newly added Article 53 goes on to element how every member nation should implement a compliance committee to make sure the WHO’s directives are adhered to and executed.
New Article 13A Entry to Well being Merchandise, Applied sciences and Know-How for Public Well being Response — “1. Instantly after the dedication of a public well being emergency of worldwide concern underneath Article 12, the Director Basic shall make an instantaneous evaluation of availability and affordability of required well being merchandise and make suggestions, together with an allocation mechanism, to keep away from any potential shortages of well being merchandise and applied sciences …
3. States Events shall present, of their mental property legal guidelines and associated legal guidelines and laws, exemptions and limitations to the unique rights of mental property holders to facilitate the manufacture, export and import of the required well being merchandise, together with their supplies and elements.”
So, as soon as a PHEIC is introduced, the director-general will lay declare to all medical sources inside the member states. Different additions additionally spell out that the WHO will management:5
|
The native manufacturing of well being merchandise |
Mental property |
|
Cell strains used within the manufacturing of biotherapeutics and vaccines |
Allocation of medical sources |
|
Biosurveillance |
Growth of regulatory tips for the fast-tracking of well being merchandise |
|
Censorship of “false and unreliable info” about public well being occasions, preventive methods and pandemic countermeasures |
A worldwide well being database (which is required for the implementation of vaccine passports) |
IHR Modification Greenlights Conflicts of Curiosity
The amendments additionally plainly enable for conflicts of curiosity that may hurt public well being. Below Article 9, the WHO can declare a public well being emergency primarily based on info from undisclosed sources. These sources might embrace Huge Pharma, WHO funders such because the Gates Basis and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, or any variety of different gamers with conflicts of curiosity.
As reported by The Defender,6 “One of many largest adjustments the WHO has seen in its 75-year historical past is a shift from funding from sovereign nations to funding from personal events.”
At current, the vast majority of the WHO’s funding comes from Invoice Gates, via donations from the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis, GAVI and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Improvements (CEPI). Gates additionally funds the World Financial Discussion board, and his nonprofits are taking cash from drug corporations.
What this implies is that Gates and drug corporations wield huge energy over the WHO. It’s not even near being impartial. A majority of the WHO’s funding can be “specified,” which means it’s earmarked for specific applications. So, the WHO can not allocate these funds wherever they’re wanted most, and this additionally massively influences what the WHO does and the way it does it.
There’s no getting round this level: The WHO is a company that does no matter its funders need it to do, and that doesn’t bode effectively for international well being, contemplating medical errors are already a number one reason for demise, and have been for many years. The IHR amendments mainly open the door large to mass medical experimentation on humanity with out knowledgeable consent, and if the COVID pandemic is any indication, nothing good will come from that.
PHEIC Definition Expanded to Embody Simply About Something
The amendments additionally radically develop the conditions that may represent a PHEIC. A PHEIC is at the moment outlined as an “extraordinary occasion” in a single nation that constitutes “a public well being threat to different states via the worldwide unfold of illness and to doubtlessly require a coordinated worldwide response.”
Amendments search to develop and broaden this definition to incorporate issues like clusters of an infection with potential however unverified human-to-human transmission. The precise dangers of such clusters don’t even must be evaluated. What’s extra, the proposed definition of a PHEIC doesn’t specify that it should contain “extreme” or “life-threatening” illness, so it might be invoked for absolutely anything.
One of many amendments additionally suggests giving the director-general the flexibility to declare an “intermediate public well being alert” when the state of affairs doesn’t absolutely meet the PHEIC standards. In such an occasion, the director-general and/or a regional WHO director would be capable of declare a public well being emergency of regional concern (PHERC).7
As urged by Campbell, to actually perceive what they’re making an attempt to do right here, flick through the Article by Article Compilation of Proposed Amendments8 for your self. Most undoubtedly, don’t imagine the “truth checkers” who say there’s nothing to see right here.
Treaty Will Broaden WHO’s Energy Past Pandemics
As talked about earlier, once you add within the proposed pandemic treaty, the WHO’s powers develop even additional, as a result of along with increasing emergency powers throughout pandemics, the treaty additionally emphasizes the “One Well being”9,10 agenda, and that covers nearly every thing you may consider.
As illustrated within the graphic11 under, the One Well being agenda is predicated on the premise {that a} broad vary of features of life and the surroundings can affect well being and due to this fact fall underneath the “potential” to trigger hurt.
This graphic under isn’t complete. The scope of One Well being, in line with a One Well being Fee doc,12 additionally consists of communications, economics, civil society, international commerce, commerce and safety, public coverage and regulation, analysis, noncommunicable ailments, agricultural land use (which entails forcing farmers off their land), catastrophe preparedness and response, illness surveillance, the “human-animal bond” (no matter which means) and far more.
Below the brand new treaty, the WHO could have unilateral energy to make choices about all of those areas, and its dictates will supersede and overrule any and all native, state and federal legal guidelines. For instance, underneath One Well being, the WHO will be capable of declare local weather change as a well being emergency and implement local weather lockdowns to deal with it.
One Well being Is A part of The Nice Reset Agenda
One Well being mainly mirrors The Nice Reset agenda. It simply makes use of a special title and justifies all these Nice Reset adjustments as a method to “defend well being.” Not surprisingly, One Well being is financed and promoted by a protracted listing of Nice Reset backers, together with the United Nations, the European Union and varied U.S. federal businesses,13,14 the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis, GAVI, the Wellcome Belief, UNICEF, CEPI, the World Financial Discussion board and the World Financial institution.
However whereas these entities are formally funding the pandemic trade, what’s actually taking place is that they’re utilizing taxes to fund rich individuals, who in flip exploit the poor. It’s as removed from philanthropic as you will get.
Taxpayers are offering the cash whereas personal profiteers are deciding how that cash is spent, and it’s being spent in methods that may profit themselves. So, it’s a private-public “partnership” the place the general public is being robbed and all the advantages go to the personal sector.
As reported by Paraschiva Florescu and Rob Verkerk Ph.D., with the Alliance for Pure Well being Worldwide:15
“The One Well being method is aligned with WHO’s linear and reductionist considering that seeks to distill all potential options to at least one view of the underlying science, one view on the required medicines, and just one reality.
This monolithic method spells grave risks for humanity on condition that it’s bottom-up, decentralized, regionally particular approaches to complicated well being issues which have at all times been proven to work. High-down, “one dimension matches all” approaches, particularly ones twisted by conflicted pursuits, are doomed to failure.
Solely those that fail to take a look at the broader scientific image are ready to persuade themselves that the WHO’s first international try at managing a pandemic, involving masks, lockdowns and genetic vaccines, was a hit.
At its core, the WHO’s prolonged powers will result in much more censorship and can dismantle the notion of consensus science constructed on a clear, scientific methodology …
With out a world rebellion by the grassroots, these amendments will go forward. Our silence and passivity are our consent. It’s, with out query, a part of the gradual descent into totalitarianism, taking us additional and additional away from ideas and values which have characterised many civilizations over current millennia, specifically the precise to liberty, the rights of the person, and the significance of nationwide sovereignty.”
To study extra, try the Cease Vax Passports Process Power webinar on One Well being,16 out there on NTD.com.
World Menace Detection Community Launched
Already, the WHO has launched a worldwide risk detection community, the Worldwide Pathogen Surveillance Community (IPSN), to “assist defend individuals from infectious illness threats via the facility of pathogen genomics.”17 Apparently, it absolutely expects to be granted all of the powers that the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty will impart.
This community will likely be used to gather and analyze pathogenic samples, which in flip will drive the WHO’s public well being choices. As described in a press launch:18
“The IPSN, with a Secretariat hosted by the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, brings collectively specialists worldwide on the cutting-edge of genomics and information analytics, from governments, philanthropic foundations, multilateral organizations, civil society, academia and the personal sector.
All share a standard aim: to detect and reply to illness threats earlier than they grow to be epidemics and pandemics, and to optimize routine illness surveillance …
COVID-19 highlighted the essential function pathogen genomics performs in responding to pandemic threats. With out the fast sequencing of the SARS-COV-2 genome, vaccines wouldn’t have been as efficient, or have been made out there so shortly.
New, extra transmissible variants of the virus wouldn’t have been as shortly recognized. Genomics lies on the coronary heart of efficient epidemic and pandemic preparedness and response, in addition to a part of the continued surveillance of an unlimited vary of ailments, from foodborne ailments and influenza to tuberculosis and HIV.”
The issue, after all, is that the COVID “vaccines,” developed at warp velocity utilizing genomic sequencing, have been neither efficient nor secure. Many have died inside two weeks of getting their jab, and after a number of months, the effectiveness grow to be damaging. That is the expertise they now need to use for every thing. The dangers shifting this agenda ahead are near-incomprehensible.
So, to summarize and recap, the globalist takeover hinges on the profitable creation of a suggestions loop of surveillance for virus variants, declaration of potential threat adopted by lockdowns and restrictions, adopted by mass vaccinating populations to “finish” the pandemic restrictions, adopted by extra surveillance and so forth. The funding for this scheme comes primarily from taxpayers, whereas the income go to firms and their buyers.
Present Timeline
As soon as the amendments are adopted by the World Well being Meeting, nations could have solely a restricted time to reject them. Any nation that hasn’t formally rejected the amendments will then be legally sure by them, and any try to reject them after the six-month grace interval will likely be null and void.
Because it at the moment stands, the IHR amendments will likely be voted on within the World Well being Meeting (WHA) in Could 2024. They solely want a majority vote to move. If that vote occurs as deliberate, then the 10-month deadline for member states to reject the amendments will expire in March 2025, and the amendments will come into power in Could 2025. If a member state opts out, then the present 2005 IHR model will apply to that state.
The WHO pandemic treaty may also be voted on by the WHA in Could 2024. It requires a two-thirds majority vote to move, and 30 member international locations to ratify it. Thirty days after ratification, the treaty will take power for the international locations that signed it.
Invoice Launched to Require Senate Approval, however Is It Sufficient?
Happily, the U.S. Senate just isn’t solely clueless concerning the ramifications of this treaty, and 17 Republican senators, led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have launched a invoice to thwart the WHO’s energy seize.19
The “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty With out Senate Approval Act,”20 launched February 15, 2023, would require a Senate supermajority (two-thirds or 67 senators) to move the pandemic treaty.
Nevertheless, in line with Boyle,21 an knowledgeable on worldwide legal guidelines and treaties, even this invoice won’t be sufficient to guard us have been President Biden to signal the treaty. The explanation for it is because the treaty is written “particularly to avoid the Senate-approval course of.”
A much more efficient technique, he says, could be for Congress to withhold its annual contributions to the WHO — after which withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether.
I imagine it might be value supporting all of those methods. So, please, contact your representatives and urge them to help the “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty With out Senate Approval Act,” to withhold funding for the WHO and, in the end, help U.S. withdrawal from the WHO.
